From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: LSP vs Emacs indentation [ Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 14:51:59 -0700 Message-ID: <864jlpnhts.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <87bkg4bkfu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <83a5voa328.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6pw9tpa.fsf@gmail.com> <875y6bm5ut.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87r0oz6i9p.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87wmypb5dq.fsf@gnu.org> <871qgxxjnz.fsf@thornhill.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23849"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (windows-nt) Cc: Tassilo Horn , =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Theodor Thornhill , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Theodor Thornhill via "Emacs development discussions." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 00:04:53 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qP96K-0005xV-TP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:04:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qP8v1-0003ak-94; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:53:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qP8v0-0003ac-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.38.55] helo=progateway7-pub.mail.pro1.eigbox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qP8uy-0000CQ-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from cmgw14.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.129]) by progateway7.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AEF1003FEBB for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 21:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from host2007.hostmonster.com ([67.20.76.71]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id P8tvqo1B7jnQ1P8tvqbGkk; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 21:52:03 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=dLtjJMVb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64c2e703 a=dWLzHQi6WpdymmZIwiVdBw==:117 a=Fln8i1WyhtedwaIJAdHvmw==:17 a=OWjo9vPv0XrRhIrVQ50Ab3nP57M=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=ws7JD89P4LkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=vvvmwbhNdt4A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=GyON3Z6XOw80Op9mx40A:9 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stephe-leake.org; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+Ssj7BXh8d78MTV/5eN/KbAG4NEHUYRNPx4CgXU1DSE=; b=FY3Swei9/LkVn+4itVzq79nZf6 Cfj3WpMMfspCq4DGkFxb1q2qYlrMHcsg70PU4MaDsmA9f1vpDot0yu7z+WTExZO3kn2O2TkbDAYfL DbrfQXFyj3FP8+V1HNnfZVU9s6sxy1iHaaW3p5rxYawEoR4bbNjOU1wYO1RFfVDoOG4RJoAQiM6Gf 88L4T5xY51nfmL5SS5FzOcRYDcUjZFmdfAf6z51aZFBucLehonZQj/yUgEcsp7Nt3X5hWM7XixO3/ x07wxkeJm37//3/jVIM00w2sALONhBFjToazH5XOu0T/vYPon27vMFE/ZZWSUEo2U/WVGVxDLmZaT 0AKC9WOQ==; Original-Received: from 135-180-197-170.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net ([135.180.197.170]:53555 helo=DESKTOP-G20DCG1) by host2007.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qP8tu-000Rav-2F; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:52:02 -0600 In-Reply-To: <871qgxxjnz.fsf@thornhill.no> (Theodor Thornhill via's message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 +0200") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host2007.hostmonster.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stephe-leake.org X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 135.180.197.170 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1qP8tu-000Rav-2F X-Source-Sender: 135-180-197-170.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net (DESKTOP-G20DCG1) [135.180.197.170]:53555 X-Source-Auth: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3RlcGhlbGU7c3RlcGhlbGU7aG9zdDIwMDcuaG9zdG1vbnN0ZXIuY29t X-Local-Domain: yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=67.222.38.55; envelope-from=stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org; helo=progateway7-pub.mail.pro1.eigbox.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308178 Archived-At: Theodor Thornhill via "Emacs development discussions." writes: > Consider (| is the cursor) > > ``` > func foo() {|} > ``` > > Now if you type RET we'd expect some incantation of > > ``` > func foo() { > | > } > ``` > > to be the expected output, not the cursor at col 0, which is what > happens now. That means we'd have to do something like > > > Where the 'eglot-newline-and-indent-according-to-mode' has to calculate > the expected indentation. I don't understand how we'd expect the > formatters to do that indentation for us. They only care about code > already written, not code yet to be written. So if we'd have to > calculate that offset anyway, do we win much? Your "newline-and-indent" function could insert some bogus code (probably "bar;" or "bar();") and ask LSP to format that, then delete the bogus code. -- -- Stephe