From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug or feature? Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:55:04 +0300 Message-ID: <864j9uwsh3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zfsn7evr.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87zfsn7evr.fsf@yahoo.com> <86v82soj02.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 09:55:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sIOGR-000A3S-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 09:55:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIOFt-0001Yw-Lv; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 03:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIOFs-0001YJ-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 03:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIOFq-0007fV-DE; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 03:55:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=qOrsaIUsfmcb1rqO1IBd5dRczEZs/CLQrMbzfffR5nE=; b=HOyw3CGfxjPd GqsivMV/Kbg8bWb62B5ZZd3VQOHdv5WKDi5aFP8XlVoZbK74jps/Os6xTBo6mWV6nrULyWfBnQ7ft OrYRsy5sxQuUZOUYMD0XRjsm1XVXI8haYNqXvZQtdFbYru+KTm7WGDnTbdF+Jo9jORTVvgheu8Vn6 i5faiivd1PDxZ1RvAWXTJ9SXEOqBqlzHlY96iYWSvKodS10hj+JJF0rs8GpPkTueWDoIuKKBRY9AU wFBEVzgZ5j4NVlsMiegfpshIaN0D3qsqYA46FI6Y7FRXauNw2svwOMH8k39XRc98HwKNOo5XRETrr lBjNkVWU5p/CL+fPc5JkGg==; In-Reply-To: <86v82soj02.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:06:05 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320113 Archived-At: Ping! > Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:06:05 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Po Lu > > Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 15:34:00 +0800 > > > > There is an elaborate segment of code in reset_buffer_local_variables > > for, among other actions, eliminating outdated value cells from > > buffer-local symbols that is not run when the shortcut is taken of > > clearing local_var_alist_ in the case where PERMANENT_TOO is set, which > > I suspect results in variable watchers being ignored and outdated symbol > > values persisting. Is there a specific reason for this discrepancy, or > > is it just an oversight? > > Stefan, any comments? > >