From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: weak hash tables Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 16:27:01 +0300 Message-ID: <864j946kbe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <-plQctKgNkvp-LJ9ov2QAiXQKxd9V-hI0yz_opRGxQtbknubCjH4rH2-ymgbw_Qr1ZhB1rtlmiEW8XtuIVNr7nR_Yj20AH6WkH6kUGp68g0=@protonmail.com> <_mNcR6ailVKpYHLxgfo_tJlYGeR0AQIzQWluspYYp5_g5pIIKkHLNfFkklQQgOKNiVW8jn8NS3i2dJ7_B2Qyx9v-Dq3MQ9mP8HNL30UWsqY=@protonmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 05 15:28:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sPiz5-0002x5-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 15:28:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPiyC-0006RX-5z; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPiy9-0006RD-Iv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPiy9-0004dX-8u; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:27:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=HuBiPnnj50hbckUHDXFx9Rv7UWQqJfx8SE7dyO3MMW8=; b=b0yUxgSrwQDZ x6VUdwd/FWU3URu16zOOFI1/gwRVWMquUDFfg4yfZus3IIxBdOr9FZGK1fVYkTIjMTeQoxGoJT8QA YXsBmsjOOUEImw1pPIMKPKUja17glxVMvDb4Zu4vyrbmPH7OYfzW+iU3E0lg/yyLSniywR/4ydQR6 iI4UHVkJeROhb8rcOAFyWRLWHCs45EPb38VhOg/nw65vYbwotHT1wLQy4ulibPg3BZ0cloEW9MLEv oI88p4SBqIoN2vh2REIWnoCQ6YHfOtJO6EtdWmT7L96BziMBnmtucG9wvKwtZvJOhHf/rrKphNrpS rNwDGVT0AF/RxFYwTQ9bfg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Fri, 05 Jul 2024 12:08:55 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321393 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 12:08:55 +0000 > From: Pip Cet > Cc: Helmut Eller , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs Devel > > At least we've excluded WIDE_EMACS_INT :-) Which is a pity, IMNSHO, and a major disappointment for me personally, since I'm a happy user of that configuration for many years. > Feature/bug-wise, what's still missing? AFAIU, there are still several areas that were not tested on the branch, and therefore we don't have a clear idea whether they work and how well/stable. Here's a list (note: not _the_ list) off the top of my head: . Lisp threads . modules . finalizers (including their relation to modules) . TTY frames, including with C-g and Lisp threads I'm sure there's more.