From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:59:55 +0200 Message-ID: <864j2egaqs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org> <87msgdkt29.fsf@gmail.com> <86h66lnjrt.fsf@gnu.org> <868qrxnfrw.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5ccl2zx.fsf@gmail.com> <875xn0p3l1.fsf@protonmail.com> <86ldvwm190.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyh8nczh.fsf@protonmail.com> <867c7fncom.fsf@gnu.org> <87pll3ivzs.fsf@gmail.com> <868qrrf04z.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30605"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 11:00:44 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tU0xX-0007ke-Cu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:00:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU0ws-0005Ln-D2; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU0wr-0005Ky-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU0wq-0001a1-Hu; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:00:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=4jxUyZfJpu/6HBfouCo0+HjNU7sgsKlzDKZdx8D8eA8=; b=o4apc4ZMFAIbDOksjdAO EZxjI3kpMH+uL9wt4yCdFv1lnpvle2sy0sXcI83fP1meTWDdowt1r4NambrCduHWsNW2JCmMzotbK 3JFGszkGu0m7lVlqnyy3DrQHtp5vLQgwIb7S3r2GdquLG4vTzHCd5Yg+oHcV71HVuh5qBYYmM1CSL 2b13QyWW0uHFYGtRsj+CIAwARcwqtOCgUI5IlnzNmgLhVbfpTpgtKDKQNWhgNiKwVI+3xPU1uAF+u 1VGrc4zmDFBx6xCznwp1ktDwSuccHjxnVepytMhVTPc53xzrjZxL+JLppk8r1DtnUOnHLwWgdQxao qB1FkDW6RRxfEw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6llmann?= on Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:02:07 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327660 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:02:07 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Why does time matter? A profile shows the percentage of the samples > > that we found ourselves in every function. Time is never of any > > importance, AFAIU. That's why the frequency of SIGPROF does not > > matter very much, except for very low percent values. IOW, the > > frequency of SIGPROF can explain why we miss some functions, but > > that's all. > > Well, when I read "42% so-and-so" in the profile result, I always read > that as "42% of the time spent in so-and-so". But that's not an accurate interpretation, is it? My interpretation of 42% is "we found 42% of samples to be inside the function so-and-so."