From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "A. Soare" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New paren matching feature request Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:48:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8643544.333831233366508350.JavaMail.www@wwinf4610> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233366530 24841 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2009 01:48:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 31 02:50:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LT4zh-0004cX-Fp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:50:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4yP-00085Q-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4yJ-00084M-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4yH-000848-Gs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53653 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LT4yH-000845-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:33 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp1.voila.fr ([193.252.22.174]:38767) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LT4yG-0000p9-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:32 -0500 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4018.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 63183700008E; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:48:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from wwinf4610 (wwinf4610 [10.232.13.53]) by mwinf4018.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5824E7000082; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:48:28 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20090131014828361.5824E7000082@mwinf4018.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [92.82.181.103] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108431 Archived-At: I still believe that my idea of indetation as an integral over the sexp is = better than the current local-parsing idea of identation. Maybe you will consider it one day. > Message du 31/01/09 =C3=A0 02h39 > De : "Stefan Monnier" > A : rms@gnu.org > Copie =C3=A0 : alinsoar@voila.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Objet : Re: New paren matching feature request >=20 >=20 > > I have a feeling that the right way to do this kind of colorization > > is through Font Lock mode, and that the hardest part of the job > > is hooking it up to the structure of jit-lock. >=20 > I agree and I also think that Alin's right in that the best way to do it > is via parse-partial-sexp (suitably enhanced if/as needed). > Font-lock-mode already uses parse-partial-sexp to do > comment&string highlighting. >=20 >=20 > Stefan >=20 >=20 ____________________________________________________ =C3=89coutez en un clic votre musique pr=C3=A9f=C3=A9r=C3=A9e et d=C3=A9cou= vrez de nouveaux titres en affinit=C3=A9 avec vos go=C3=BBts sur http://mus= iline.voila.fr=20