From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:46:11 +0200 Message-ID: <8634ug3zy4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86msssble8.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk9448ai.fsf@gnu.org> <864jew40m3.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 29 16:48:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTrm-0004jE-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:48:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTpy-0000Hp-8O; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:46:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTpu-0000GG-MU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:46:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUTpu-0005CD-8B; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:46:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=UJb5bbctNnfr7NllhjCaKl3vns0rvSJALQu51bf2HSw=; b=nO+OdmVpab4R RvAr9/KqaNpN5Hl6RBfjdgNRPn/XsFci9t3pWKm4hHCMjrZl+2Mo1a0vLEHr6JPk02dUBBAzU0zaC k7gJUbkH8I+zti1W5DCbkH3Jd7eMnb1qm5+3e/fTneLPbRoaqI/4qnU/82qDoZIp3kcSyYyHH2BhN neF8QXKFfkuPtvFc1vdUKZbXI14/XpSctH31wB0qKejSop6xkXj75VSECWX89tBvYlCPOEm0tn/nx blo+4lCANcrH9tPANg5IkFlgr3CQ+k953EMHG0cvmskaQ8EXYTAfCdY1hw9utXMqOYsMuMB0f766X 2nbbCNyEEb9Vh/s1P76fFQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:41:37 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315594 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:41:37 -0500 > > > And the reason(s) you are "annoyed at the use of lists to represent > > function values" are?... IOW, what will we gain by using your changes > > in this matter? > > Beside taste and philosophical differences, the main motivation is to > make `consp` and `functionp` mutually exclusive so as to eliminate the > risk that a list be considered mistakenly as a function or vice versa. Is that a serious risk? In what situations could that happen?