From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5a125fb5a97 1/2: Update to Org 9.7.3 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:13:15 +0300 Message-ID: <8634pi1ez8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <171796793548.23337.12512115872160390161@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240609211858.A2C31C1F9FB@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a5jtd403.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6e1lhtd.fsf@kyleam.com> <8734plcvg9.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r0d271g4.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, kyle@kyleam.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 12 15:13:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNnW-00061S-CI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:13:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNn3-0002zl-7Z; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNn1-0002u8-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNmx-00022c-8w; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:13:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fytkkt6zw6aTXVGYNKiATAybezF1/OqNm1f1qrbvRRE=; b=Q5z5m5H6c4CZ lYe88zlRmzhIxEdGxUQgspV9V8zAyKsaB0GRBu9c/zFdL7++cwjD4StqbPX1SMcjY3PGXv+3y4Wkq UslBXgEiASSdSxgt7GD6cX72gq0JbBI9jUyUuZKTIiuDtYxMr/hr33NnxnnxInS+ux8ifXDPXEqAA SbgJzY+HWnvp9zsSvk6RL9E2mXpA1ccgql4z/WKkxPMdp2j85F9aflLigBtqMoZ9kaVyGllgVGk6q 3OL2MFkNXxgARfxwH5LnoKpKU6JXroL3C+QDkf6e4A1HvRDlsxH6OwI9iEQWZwqoc7XeqNFXL/zos 7uNYk7R8hUwpyDIMqfxXLw==; In-Reply-To: <87r0d271g4.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:08:59 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319995 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: Kyle Meyer , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:08:59 +0000 > > Po Lu writes: > > > Error: arith-error nil > > ceiling(0 0) > > (if pixels pixel-width (ceiling pixel-width symbol-width)) > > ... > > Needless to say, an export process should not be anywise relying on the > > value of buffer-text-pixel-size during bootstrap. > > We need this to calculate symbol width. > Is it expected that `buffer-text-pixel-size' returns 0? Why do you use buffer-text-pixel-size if all you need is the width of a symbol (which I assume is a character?). Why not use font-get-glyphs instead?