From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about =?utf-8?Q?=C3=BCarent-frame?= changes Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:29:49 +0300 Message-ID: <8634lnda4y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9bc2af0a-d3c1-4ba6-a350-af6e2b85695d@gmx.at> <87y13phwbk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17537"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 25 17:30:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1stTy8-0004Ik-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:30:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stTxi-0001VE-6s; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stTxh-0001V6-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stTxg-0002jT-GY; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:29:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=8yyhkxWv59rCo2SHDu4PZwrIqz2+7RGfohAxcdlUkU0=; b=jwGzqC8n7jQPU57WPTlB W4oeNINtRaQqTmyLF6/OiTstCsLdpm+nWKLEsSSPZTDMX8hln0z18pnzMFT6eHEQfJHMjjAdG3Km6 RFo5grnkVc9Tv4R8Hr/91sapbnyDkrGSXjoFhYy7fXK73LVFh0xDpIi+qZ3aw36Qo/QqZOVo5fSj7 N8hS6G60GOMByK+TYpxFsINBsKazum6aYdcC4bMUuOSHHIAurNHusFOlpb3c1fZjVXLvmFt2jSADa o+9h7xHDn9MmuPK5fKFs3cXcWUaTa2Qd/S56/kpWm3p7/jDssuLpmtpn7u87WQEorw/NTCt+aaAjT sRx5NiQTY8FJsA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:13:09 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324074 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: martin rudalics , Emacs Devel > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:13:09 +0200 > > > shows 24s with GUI, and 8s on tty. I'm using Alacritty, in case that matters > > (for the KKP keyboard support, not for performance). > > Small correction - I had timed tty build with debug. It's actually 2s > instead of 8s. Thanks. It would be interesting to know which part takes significantly more time on GUI terminals wrt TTYs. A tenfold performance difference should be easy to explain, I hope.