From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chetan Pandya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:18:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <862437.72141.qm@web83206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: Reply-To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235179128 22024 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2009 01:18:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 21 02:20:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LagX7-0005Qz-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:19:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39350 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LagVn-0007MO-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:18:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LagVN-0007E5-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LagVM-0007Db-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47492 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LagVM-0007DW-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from web83206.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([216.252.101.62]:22527) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LagVL-0008Af-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 74216 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Feb 2009 01:18:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=Lh1gFoTTyUtkGQMpPJWC6K5bzGa8NReg8NcLnQtzXT/i59oFh35sq1oA0cn3BMu4TxyzE87VNAJRfOM4f3VUAHvPq7yh4lq1tZkZ2Ul3lxe65n03VB3TQcQ5QSE1cU6Qx37RKCjKQRVSCcdIGR3ZdL6uI6V4bE6CZmstrF8ViZs=; X-YMail-OSG: zyHBHjYVM1kSQ9w91BU.6B5IhXIP2YvtGUmL6s7KVe31vCDRjfKQvo1Rt77PcFQlRs9L2D6eNf4pJlYWCxFHzHNVsvSZ4USOnWY_i_cjqTM.Fjkr7fUifA8puNzBMs4d9uCw7Lf5o9DZZAcxUo.UD8xFA.VZeTTOXZMRGlsBMyC04Q-- Original-Received: from [76.200.183.251] by web83206.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:18:06 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109265 Archived-At: > I'm not sure that yanking from the full headers makes a lot of sense, > though. Eg it includes the X-RMAIL headers in the yank. Would you ever > want to include the full headers (all the Received: etc) in a reply? > > I doubt it, but this combination ought to do what is natural in the > circumstances, which is to yank the headers that are visible. > To do otherwise would require artificially filtering them in a second place. > > if the user asks for it, we may as well do what he asked for. Personally, I don't find it terribly important. Just as it is possible to trim the message content to reply only a part of the mail, it would be possible to remove the headers as well, if not required. I am also in favor of continuity with existing behaviour, unless there is a good reason not to. Chetan