From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:42:23 +0100 Message-ID: <861wju4ub4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop> <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173696170 24888 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2007 10:42:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 12 11:42:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQhzG-0004lu-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:42:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQhzu-0005dl-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQhzi-0005dg-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQhzg-0005dU-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQhzg-0005dR-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQhz1-0005Db-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.15.219]) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06021 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:42:21 +0100 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 8222 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2007 10:42:23 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Mar 2007 10:42:23 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E892724B55; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:42:23 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon\, 12 Mar 2007 11\:39\:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67781 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 3/9/07, Chong Yidong wrote: > >> I would like to suggest issuing a pretest on Monday the 12th. What do >> people think? > > If you don't mind, I'd like to reach a consensus with respect to the > emacsclient / isearch discussion in emacs-pretest-bugs. The proposed > patch is tiny (seven lines plus comments), but the issue is larger, as > it seems like Richard doesn't like emacsclient / server "forcibly > exit[ing] the minibuffer" or "interfer[ing] with isearch". Well, seems like diverting the pretest-bug list to emacs-devel might not be the worst idea after all. -- David Kastrup