From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:15:05 +0200
Message-ID: <861q8b8r2e.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <yp134tb5yjk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <E1rgFkA-0001Dn-Eo@fencepost.gnu.org> <86sf19p0hw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E1rhLhI-0004Oq-5j@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <13305.117729918$1709671403@news.gmane.org>
 <87y1aku44q.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87wmq3vf57.fsf@yandex.com>
 <877ci3iiwj.fsf@localhost> <87sf0rvdpt.fsf@yandex.com>
 <87le6jvd1r.fsf@yandex.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="9308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: m43cap@yandex.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 16:15:43 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rl9HZ-0002AL-Ua
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:15:42 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rl9H4-0005Fm-N1; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:15:10 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rl9H2-0005En-FA
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:15:08 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rl9H2-0000SR-1d; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:15:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=7WGg80ohdLS3wbtBy+1i+kshSiRlNPZPDvj9tqgFzpA=; b=StRWJ98V+Dvr
 6KsAs2ktto/h6j6+i70VwIcm0waYsddTZYh/1h5EMVk+A8eiiVNqbsWKlHhJ1GLyl/9lkLk96aML1
 4yeJaaa7ajDyvA3cdsfHKDDqq38OacgWCAnMPzBueb/lJCXDjuKKa3ri1ZeFE/TsTgTwHEHfKMxVp
 n45luYaqrsK+3RHtbXzv64dKhBx0vUbDuioh0cWLC6dxq/YZ6q/5rkh91Ex/CDa+iVtU9mJUhs2wn
 nwQF60ZJRskWi3KZDybmPxzelBtASmR3aheTUard63OSdKgNYgaUdS0EICGuRQ+Krz5jYqSsujBWQ
 qKteuFK7Ths3cUpynqxr/A==;
In-Reply-To: <87le6jvd1r.fsf@yandex.com> (message from Colin Baxter on Fri, 15
 Mar 2024 13:29:20 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317077
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/317077>

> From: Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:29:20 +0000
> 
> 
> My argument is against the notion that default native compilation is a
> "no brainer". I suggest it's a "some brainer". There are issues about
> what libgccjit flag to pass when compiling, as was pointed out in the
> link, whether two years old or not.

What do you mean by "what libgccjit flag to pass when compiling"?  I
didn't find anything in that old post which matches that description.