From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Quail Devanagari ITRANS Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:56:55 +0300 Message-ID: <861q2p6me0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86zfpekxmp.fsf@gmx.net> <86le0xtq9j.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15765"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: atamariya@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Thomas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 16 07:57:48 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sepy7-0003tC-Gi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:57:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sepxM-0001eA-HK; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 01:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sepxK-0001dv-3v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 01:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sepxJ-00013e-Mo; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 01:56:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=tV6gHlygNmgqew20pzH0CHeSN4ZfIOVNxptE7AMCye0=; b=S4YTLF+bJaetwfpVOq/n OPVeUTDP/jrk8jGGZ0zly6IeCocTBBBhGjI2l8Wh7QA8jnqaFRMQ/+D/BirsF1C8UhXkHHcOAcWV6 Ui3xsBIcO923p6cFz3D9+5Hd/WhpK0CovH0QeOgDguYUty1OtCjaSC4SC5rbzeA57Sg4WL6dYQhwx AiYuYODaZh4C7W5sKy6GOxORaE4S9kg0i0b/FjEbadAc72ShuI3dyQP0ZZ/OIv+J2hLf+mb78Mtk7 1u43MNVN/0kakCG3QfoZ++LWP3k05xUiku6AVCqC6GuaHd1sbR7upMscOvDy+oUxpWM14XV19XS1b E0r0TyQa72uq3w==; In-Reply-To: <86le0xtq9j.fsf@gmx.net> (message from James Thomas on Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:14:40 +0530) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322796 Archived-At: > From: James Thomas > Cc: Emacs Devel > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:14:40 +0530 > > Anand Tamariya wrote: > > > I get कलश . A screencast here https://imgur.com/BmqX8Lh > > (That server is not loading) > > Could be a rendering problem, then; because it works fine here. Do > files with this composition display properly? What's the output of > describe-char (on the 1st character)? Did you try building with/without > Harfbuzz? Are you using Windows by any chance (info "(emacs) Windows > Fonts")? Or an old font? Try out some different ones. FTR: this renders just fine on Windows 11, using the system fonts. The first grapheme cluster (of the two created by this input) is reported as follows: position: 148 of 153 (96%), column: 0 character: क (displayed as क) (codepoint 2325, #o4425, #x915) charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646)) code point in charset: 0x0915 script: devanagari syntax: w which means: word category: .:Base, L:Strong L2R, i:Indian to input: type "ka" with devanagari-itrans input method buffer code: #xE0 #xA4 #x95 file code: not encodable by coding system iso-latin-1-dos display: composed to form "क्ले" (see below) Composed with the following character(s) "्ले" using this font: harfbuzz:-outline-Nirmala UI-regular-normal-normal-sans-13-*-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1 by these glyphs: [0 3 2325 401 16 -1 17 9 0 nil] [0 3 2381 312 0 -6 0 13 -9 nil] with these character(s): ् (#x94d) DEVANAGARI SIGN VIRAMA ल (#x932) DEVANAGARI LETTER LA े (#x947) DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN E Character code properties: customize what to show name: DEVANAGARI LETTER KA general-category: Lo (Letter, Other) decomposition: (2325) ('क') So I guess in the OP's case the character is either not composed or the font doesn't have a glyph for this composition.