From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: PPAATT@aol.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: across terminals Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:44:16 EDT Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <86.19bc6735.29facfd0@aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019839114 25350 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 16:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 1718jy-0006al-00 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:38:34 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1718mh-0005Bg-00 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:41:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1717uV-0007To-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1717tu-0007NP-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:44:46 -0400 Original-Received: from PPAATT@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id i.86.19bc6735 (4569); Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:44:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3306 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3306 > Subj: Re: across terminals > Date: 4/26/02 8:26:19 AM Mountain Daylight Time > From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) ... > If I were you, I'd just bind C-c where is a non-ascii > character. Then [ perhaps via C-h n view-emacs-news] > you read the NEWS files for each new Emacs, in the > unlikely event that future versions will bind such keys. Eh? If the GNU Emacs developers do mean to support binding shifted uses of keys=20 that conventionally self-insert chars outside of US-Ascii ... then I should=20 consider all of those key sequences reserved for the user? Not just C-c x=20 but also C-x, where by x we mean the unshifted but not-US-Ascii key? Or I should consider all of these keys reserved for Emacs? Or else by "what occurs commonly works well; what occurs less commonly works= =20 less well", when I see the doc not discuss this issue I should clue in and=20 work harder to imitate an American at the keyboard? Pat LaVarre