From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Incorrect indentation after :name Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:59:42 +0200 Message-ID: <85zmstk3q9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87mzozfh6w.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121081683 10295 80.91.229.2 (11 Jul 2005 11:34:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 13:34:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrwXz-0001CA-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:34:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrwZY-0006tv-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DrwY7-0006Pm-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DrwXz-0006Mx-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrwXy-0006K6-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DrwYy-0006Te-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DrwOh-0000Db-6i; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 49AAB1C40B63; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:59:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:29:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40770 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40770 Juanma Barranquero writes: > I was not talking about such a change. Someone else was talking > about making a change which would not affect elisp `if's, but would > have the side effect that Common Lisp `if's edited with > `lisp-indent-function' set to `common-lisp-indent-function' would > indent like the elisp `if's, instead of both the THEN and ELSE parts > at the same indentation depth as they currently do. Apparently, > Lawrence Mitchell didn't like that. > > I was merely stating that I think the Emacs way to indent `if' seems > *much* better to me even for Common Lisp `if's. But one would argue that with the maintainer of the Common Lisp mode and indentation routines instead of overriding an existing hook. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum