From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 11:06:26 +0200 Message-ID: <85zmi0ssml.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87r73ljvfa.fsf@myusenet.dyndns.org> <444F19B7.9080906@gmx.at> <44532003.1000709@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146560862 19396 80.91.229.2 (2 May 2006 09:07:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 02 11:07:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Faqqz-0004bM-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 11:07:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Faqqz-0005CG-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Faqqe-0005C2-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Faqqd-0005BN-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Faqqc-0005BK-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Faqqk-0000Hm-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FaqqV-0000EZ-Dv; Tue, 02 May 2006 05:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 468511C4CD66; Tue, 2 May 2006 11:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 2 May 2006 10:42:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53771 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 5/2/06, Richard Stallman wrote: > >> I don't see why we need them. What is wrong with cycling in that case? > > Nothing, probably. But, what *is* wrong with adding the faces? A complete waste of code for no apparent good whatsoever. > (It'd be useful to know wheter frequent users of re-builder are > defining them in their .emacs; certainly it's what I would expect.) So what? It is not like the cycling code would keep them from doing that if they want to. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum