From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: managing windows in two frames Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:24:33 -0500 Message-ID: <85zjrsa1i6.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <8561uiclrj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5225DB8D.6060709@gmx.at> <858uzcbggs.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378319088 9082 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2013 18:24:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 18:24:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 04 20:24:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHl3-0000Zg-GD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:24:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54694 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHl3-00024S-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHkv-00024K-Md for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHkq-0005y9-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:18021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHkq-0005y4-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:24:36 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=DqnUCRD+ c=1 sm=0 a=90MK7lSzN9hCuM5ahEFLfw==:17 a=M2z5juievrMA:10 a=yJoioP6_5VwA:10 a=zcTG9qZzcMYA:10 a=o_R75loqY_IA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=Lzix9T0G-1kA:10 a=TH5XI9TB8LCEEMfj86MA:9 a=FMD1XRJ_Ct4A:10 a=90MK7lSzN9hCuM5ahEFLfw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 75.87.84.149 Original-Received: from [75.87.84.149] ([75.87.84.149:56782] helo=TAKVER) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id D3/8D-14028-3EA77225; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 18:24:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <858uzcbggs.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (Stephen Leake's message of "Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:16:03 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 71.74.56.122 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163189 Archived-At: Stephen Leake writes: > martin rudalics writes: > >>> (defun display-buffer-reuse-frame (buffer alist) >> >> I'd call it `display-buffer-other-frame' ("reuse" currently has the >> connotation that a window already displays the buffer in question). > > Ah; I was focused on "don't create a frame", similar to > `display-buffer-reuse-window' doesn't create a window. But you are > correct about it implying the buffer is already shown in that frame. However, `display-buffer-other-frame' is already defined in window.el; it's a user-level function, so I don't think we can use that name. `display-buffer-existing-frame' would work. It would make sense to add `display-buffer-reuse-frame' to display-buffer--other-frame-action, at least for my style. -- -- Stephe