From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Filling woes Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 00:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <85y8a94k0z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116628452 9437 80.91.229.2 (20 May 2005 22:34:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 21 00:34:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZG2t-0007w0-9Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 May 2005 00:32:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZG5o-0008F8-P4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:35:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DZG4W-0007mt-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DZG4K-0007gx-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZG4K-0007cH-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DZFzR-0006hA-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DZFq3-0007I7-HO; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 322E11C46512; Sat, 21 May 2005 00:20:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 20 May 2005 17:57:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37418 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37418 Richard Stallman writes: > I agree it would be better to try adaptive-fill-function first. If > it returns nil, the code should proceed to try the appropriate > regexp. This is a very incompatible change, since adaptive-fill-function's return value previously carried no meaning. While the current scheme appears braindead, we could make it somewhat saner in a compatible way by allowing adaptive-fill-regexp to be nil, in which case adaptive-fill-function would get called unconditionally. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum