From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:27:13 +0200 Message-ID: <85y89de6um.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118740850 11724 80.91.229.2 (14 Jun 2005 09:20:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 11:20:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Di7ay-0005s2-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:20:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Di7fw-00076y-C3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Di7NV-0004DI-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Di7KB-0003wl-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Di7K7-0003sq-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Di7Hf-00048I-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 05:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Di7Fp-00055R-BM; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 04:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 53E7F1C4CE19; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:27:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2005 02:16:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38791 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38791 Juanma Barranquero writes: >> I can see how this could be confusing. I suggest using names >> OLD-OBSOLETE-NAME and CURRENT-RECOMMENDED-NAME. > > I like these, but they are a bit too long for docstrings, etc. > Wouldn't just OBSOLETE-NAME and RECOMMENDED-NAME (or CURRENT-NAME) > suffice? How about just OBSOLETE and CURRENT? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum