From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: position on changing defaults? Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:55:29 +0100 Message-ID: <85y78m8f1q.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87hcfkdhqk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pru8enjx.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <8763vy95a6.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87wsoc39i8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <877igb7dsi.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87hcff5upc.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87fxuxsg3m.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87r6egp8oo.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <47D86DC6.4080805@gmail.com> <85od9j9if1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d4py3i8z.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <86wso67nxi.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87tzjawe8o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205445370 8607 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 21:56:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , "Kim F. Storm" , miles@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 22:56:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZvPa-0006X5-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:56:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvP1-00027s-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:55:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvOv-00023B-3Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:55:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvOt-0001yr-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvOt-0001yS-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:55:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvOk-0006tY-QP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.14]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E041040C6; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:55:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E47114336; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:55:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-030-168.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.30.168]) by mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0980236E44; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:55:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 0359D1C4F906; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:55:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87tzjawe8o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:39:03 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6225/Thu Mar 13 15:52:37 2008 on mail-in-16.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92436 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > David Kastrup writes: > > Kim Storm [it looks like] wrote: > > > > But will XEmacs ignore such an interactive spec symbol? > > Most likely it will, since we already have the feature natively. It > Just Works for me (and IIRC there have been no complaints from users) > since 2000, when it was made default. How do you expect us to come up with an incompatible implementation without volunteering more details? Anyway, it would be interesting to see how you solved the problems. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum