From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Editing exportet registry files Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 19:45:32 +0200 Message-ID: <85vf3ul8sj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <42C45594.9090207@iue.tuwien.ac.at> <1120201971.42c4ecf37e342@l01.iue.tuwien.ac.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120240318 18915 80.91.229.2 (1 Jul 2005 17:51:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "gritsch@iue.tuwien.ac.at" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 19:51:56 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoPg4-0007BM-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 19:51:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoPoZ-0003me-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoPmh-0002j4-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoPmc-0002gu-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoPmc-0002b1-FY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoPfO-00067j-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoPYR-000665-0F; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 13:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B9FBF1C3DB68; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:24:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40043 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40043 Juanma Barranquero writes: > On 7/1/05, gritsch@iue.tuwien.ac.at wrote: > >> Can you give me any advice how to achive this? > > Try > > C-x RET c utf-16-le RET > > (that's `universal-coding-system-argument'), then: > > C-x C-f yourfile RET > > and you should be able to edit the file. Shouldn't the utf-x files with signature be quite in front of the list of detected coding systems? I mean, that's what the signature is good for in the first place, right? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum