From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 03:38:21 -0600 Message-ID: <85tx137sky.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <20141205123549.GA29331@thyrsus.com> <2815659.zRQ0WWWeRr@descartes> <20141205175810.GD3120@thyrsus.com> <87lhmlncb1.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <20141205193643.GB5067@thyrsus.com> <87tx19rd1b.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141205215138.GF7784@thyrsus.com> <54823617.4000406@cs.ucla.edu> <83k325195l.fsf@gnu.org> <5482D94B.2070102@cs.ucla.edu> <5484FF31.5010808@cs.ucla.edu> <5485FC59.5030700@cs.ucla.edu> <87388p6glt.fsf@engster.org> <871to9lw6g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5486A704.6090305@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418204709 21262 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2014 09:45:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:45:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 10 10:45:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XydpN-0001TZ-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:45:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44250 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XydpN-0002nK-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XydjG-0001ar-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:38:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xydj8-0008Gz-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([70.40.196.235]:51231) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xydj8-0008Gi-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 04:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 25474 invoked by uid 0); 10 Dec 2014 09:38:33 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2014 09:38:33 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by CMOut01 with id RleW1p00d2UdiVW01leZf3; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:38:33 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OJu0g0qB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=fNEgcOh0sVsA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=jrwKn-8xaegA:10 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=fsNOXLPZrnrrVf1mnbwA:9 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] (port=56801 helo=TAKVER) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Xydj4-0007tP-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 02:38:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5486A704.6090305@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 08 Dec 2014 23:38:44 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 70.94.38.149 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 70.40.196.235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179641 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > I did find a simple way to avoid the performance problem: don't edit > the documentation and don't switch branches. But these restrictions > are really off-putting. We need to do better. One workaround while waiting for a faster makeinfo; keep branches in separate workspaces. That way switching branches doesn't mean recompiling everything. We need a good set of git recipes for this approach; I'm working on writing them up. -- -- Stephe