From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <85twmacs76.fsf@iznogoud.viz> References: <569CDB81.6040600@redhat.com> <569D6B1E.6020002@emvision.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453164374 21428 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2016 00:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ali Bahrami Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 01:46:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQu-0004ag-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:46:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34342 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQt-0003GQ-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQq-0003Fy-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:46:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQn-0004Ht-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:46:00 -0500 Original-Received: from b2bfep13.mx.upcmail.net ([62.179.121.58]:60723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQm-0004Hj-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:45:57 -0500 Original-Received: from edge12.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.82]) by b2bfep13.mx.upcmail.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.18 201-2260-151-151-20140610) with ESMTP id <20160119004552.ILRS12979.b2bfep13-int.chello.at@edge12.upcmail.net> for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:45:52 +0100 Original-Received: from iznogoud.viz ([91.119.110.52]) by edge12.upcmail.net with edge id 7clq1s00117sUYT0CclqLl; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:45:52 +0100 X-SourceIP: 91.119.110.52 Original-Received: from wolfgang by iznogoud.viz with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aLKQf-0000Vn-RY; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:45:49 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Ali Bahrami , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <569D6B1E.6020002@emvision.com> (Ali Bahrami's message of "Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:45:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 62.179.121.58 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198322 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 18 2016, Ali Bahrami wrote: > Some of them > didn't have unexec working, and we'd just use temacs instead. It took on > the order of 5-10 seconds to start up and become useful, rather than > starting instantaneously. That was nearly 20 years ago. But I guess you loaded pre-compiled elisp files on those machines?