From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: discrepancy between read-key-sequence and manual Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:05:03 +0200 Message-ID: <85sliydv9s.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85lkoqh64k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158005180 11150 80.91.229.2 (11 Sep 2006 20:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 22:06:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMs2a-0000E3-G3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:06:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMs2a-00045K-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMs1u-0003WJ-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GMs1t-0003VO-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMs1t-0003V7-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMs3E-0008PH-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:06:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GMs1m-0008Nq-3e; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4446B1C40B5C; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 11 Sep 2006 15\:58\:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59706 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Lots of documentation says that overriding-terminal-local-map > overrides overriding-local-map. So I think we should make the code > fit all that documentation. > > In practice, overriding-local-map is not used very much, so there is > not much chance for there to be code that depends on the current > behavior. > > Does this patch do the job? It would appear so, but I am currently "flying by instrument", namely just doing a 666 (reading and writing code, but not yet executing it). I'll holler when I am through. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum