From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:19:27 -0600 Message-ID: <85sidj7468.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <83pp9cwky8.fsf@gnu.org> <85a90ggf2d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <54E0A40F.5080603@dancol.org> <83sie7un20.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D181.2080802@dancol.org> <83r3trulse.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D7E0.305@87.69.4.28> <83h9unukbg.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0DEF8.7020901@dancol> <83egpruiyp.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0FF93.2000104@dancol.org> <833865vp4d.fsf@gnu.org> <54E2355A.90@87.69.4.28> <83vbj1u020.fsf@gnu.org> <54E24CA4.9020601@dancol.org> <83h9uk7ddb.fsf@gnu.org> <54E382A5.5030408@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425576391 30533 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2015 17:26:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:26:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 18:26:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZXE-00085C-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:26:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZXD-0000x6-SO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZSJ-0007br-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZSF-0000KS-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.122]:46252) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZSF-0000GL-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:20:59 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 28194 invoked by uid 0); 5 Mar 2015 17:20:54 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2015 17:20:54 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmgw4 with id 00H11q0042UdiVW010KbR3; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:19:38 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GubRpCFC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=2wGvvwaKUHMA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=jrwKn-8xaegA:10 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=BZoQArGgRgns5oPHFLAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=VlZU0XKO32wA:10 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] (port=62348 helo=TAKVER) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YTZQs-00068L-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:19:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel"'s message of "Sat, 28 Feb 2015 19:20:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 70.94.38.149 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 69.89.20.122 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183674 Archived-At: Aur=C3=A9lien Aptel writes: > I've tried to implement modules using Daniel's plan.=20 > The code is available on my github repo on the dynamic-modules-2 branch. > The interesting parts are the API header, the runtime and the sample modu= le. > > git repo: https://github.com/aaptel/emacs-dynamic-module.git Why do we need both emacs_runtime and emacs_env types? If the function pointers in emacs_env were in emacs_runtime instead, what would we lose? It seems every module will need 'bind_function', so perhaps that should be in emacs_module.h. I'll work on implementing the ada-mode parser with this, to illuminate other issues. --=20 -- Stephe