From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: <85shzy2ps5.fsf@iznogoud.viz> References: <837fheuu6a.fsf@gnu.org> <83twkiteb3.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5utbxb.fsf@gnu.org> <56DDD02A.20809@cs.ucla.edu> <83fuw2t2ue.fsf@gnu.org> <56DE0F6A.6010207@cs.ucla.edu> <83pov5rmt6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DFD78F.40205@cs.ucla.edu> <56E06093.7050509@cs.ucla.edu> <83twkfo7ij.fsf@gnu.org> <56E071AB.8050008@cs.ucla.edu> <83io0vo43x.fsf@gnu.org> <56E078DB.1020809@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1r3o248.fsf@gnu.org> <56E0CEBC.80804@cs.ucla.edu> <83lh5qn7oq.fsf@gnu.org> <56E1A3C2.4070508@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457631794 1479 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2016 17:43:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 18:43:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4c2-0005Yd-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:43:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4c1-000366-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4bW-0002l2-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4bS-0006hi-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from vie01a-dmta-at50-1.mx.upcmail.net ([62.179.121.136]:58261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4bS-0006gX-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [172.31.216.42] (helo=vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at51) by vie01a-dmta-at50.mx.upcmail.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4bN-0003Ak-Ph for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:42:21 +0100 Original-Received: from iznogoud.viz ([91.119.222.136]) by vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at51 with SMTP @ mailcloud.upcmail.net id UHiK1s00C2xAvoj0BHiKes; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:42:21 +0100 X-SourceIP: 91.119.222.136 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=J+zo10vS c=1 sm=2 tr=0 a=9SSNHgbedRLKnBhhfJkrpQ==:117 a=9SSNHgbedRLKnBhhfJkrpQ==:17 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=ukTom7hD65RvFJJ3lTgA:9 a=_F6FhZiLNRMA:10 Original-Received: from wolfgang by iznogoud.viz with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ae4bK-0000Sz-Sr; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:42:18 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 62.179.121.136 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201414 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 10 2016, Paul Eggert wrote: > When I want an accurate record of what happened, I want to see what > was actually committed, warts and all. Wouldn't git-notes be a better option then (IIUC), so that instead of the original commit message being superseded there would be a list of errata (or other notes), which git-log still shows by default?