From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:17:19 +0100 Message-ID: <85psorzskw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85acg5u9nl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lkzo1s34.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87r79fuf4z.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87u0e7i3us.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87fyppi8cl.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87mzjxdk66.fsf@jurta.org> <85iruk4qnf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87br0co9ym.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87zmnwmhlv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87irujq3ls.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132734473 10473 80.91.229.2 (23 Nov 2005 08:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 09:27:52 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eepxj-0002H5-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:26:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eepta-0006p1-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:22:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeprr-0006mw-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eepro-0006ls-27 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:20:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eeprj-0006lQ-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eeprj-00043Z-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eepre-0008Fb-F8; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 818281C12C95; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:17:19 +0100 (CET) Original-To: belanger@truman.edu In-Reply-To: <87irujq3ls.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> (Jay Belanger's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:29:19 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46471 Archived-At: Jay Belanger writes: > "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > >> For C-x , = `!', `%', `&', `*', `_', `~', >> `|', `\', `"', `:' or `,' might work, and some of them might be >> accessible without the shift key on most keyboards. But without the >> extra control key, I'm not sure they're "out of the way" enough to get >> the green light. >> >> One of those might be ok. Perhaps any of them is ok. >> I see no particular reason to oppose the use of any of them. > > Okay, great. > It looks like the only symbol listed above that is consistently > available without a modifier key (to avoid having to change the > modifier keys while typing the key sequence in) is the comma. > > Before I formally request the keybinding, are there any objections to > using `C-x,' for `calc-dispatch'? It's so unmnemonic. # at least means "number". I don't have a better suggestion, though. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum