From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs crashes Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:36:38 +0100 Message-ID: <85oe09mkpl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <17429.54459.803236.351040@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142331073 32047 80.91.229.2 (14 Mar 2006 10:11:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 14 11:11:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ6Ue-0001pG-JJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:11:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ6Ud-0004JI-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ6UM-0004Iq-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:10:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ6UL-0004IP-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:10:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJ6UL-0004ID-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:10:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FJ6YV-0007CU-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FJ6UJ-0007mX-U3; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 05:10:48 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 7F2B11C3DB5D; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:36:38 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:02:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51594 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 3/13/06, Kim F. Storm wrote: >> Nick Roberts writes: > >> > It would appear to be less stable than it was two years ago: > >> It *is* *much* less stable that it was a week ago! > > Impossible! Absurd! We're in a feature freeze, after all... New bugs can be introduced by fixing old ones. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum