From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Nested sit-for's
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:02:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85odujzchd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3y7tnfw9o.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (Kim F. Storm's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:15:47 +0200")
storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> It would work to have ONE timer that does sit-for if we make a rule
>> that no others can do so. We could define jit-lock as this one
>> exception. (This has the advantage of not involving any change in
>> the code, just comments and the Lisp Manual.)
>>
>> What do people think of that?
>
> I agree with your analysis.
>
> In general, timers should never use sit-for, so I think we should
> document that in the manual.
>
> But, IMO, if we make it a rule that timers should generally not use
> sit-for, then a central function like jit-lock should definitely not
> use sit-for!
If we are in the temptation to let a central function like jit-lock
use sit-for in a timer, that means that there is a general perceived
need to do that. So we should create a convenient way to do the
equivalent, document it, and use it ourselves.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1GD2sr-0005PH-UP@savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <m3bqqlka7e.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
[not found] ` <87y7tp90i1.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
2006-08-16 8:14 ` Nested sit-for's Kim F. Storm
2006-08-16 19:08 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-17 6:02 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-17 11:15 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-17 14:02 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2006-08-18 15:47 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-17 14:14 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-17 15:09 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-17 17:21 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-17 21:28 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-17 22:42 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-17 16:05 ` martin rudalics
2006-08-17 21:33 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-18 9:03 ` martin rudalics
2006-08-18 9:26 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-20 13:54 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-20 21:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-20 21:52 ` martin rudalics
2006-08-20 22:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-21 11:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-21 11:45 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-08-21 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-08-21 17:18 ` martin rudalics
2006-08-22 1:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-08-22 7:42 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-17 14:21 ` Chong Yidong
2006-08-18 15:47 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-17 14:41 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-18 5:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-18 7:40 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-23 7:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-17 15:33 ` Drew Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85odujzchd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).