From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: process_send_string blocks? Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:32:43 -0500 Message-ID: <85lhpvb28k.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <85y4txdvbh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83r3zpcctv.fsf@gnu.org> <85ppf8evwu.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83oausdgka.fsf@gnu.org> <85tx4jn8mz.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83egvncu4s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410121997 3227 80.91.229.3 (7 Sep 2014 20:33:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 07 22:33:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XQj93-00081e-8r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:33:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39517 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQj92-0005ZZ-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQj8v-0005ZS-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQj8q-00018x-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.73.228]:56354 helo=dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XQj8q-00018f-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] ([70.94.38.149:51390] helo=TAKVER) by dnvrco-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id A5/05-18326-7F0CC045; Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:32:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83egvncu4s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 07 Sep 2014 18:44:51 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.118:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=btPCBSqi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:117 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=9XSUBuVRJI8A:10 a=s72kT6VaQ4sA:10 a=fvGhXoG7zBsA:10 a=o_R75loqY_IA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=qAM6cCoPjQoxuXH0bY0A:9 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=FMD1XRJ_Ct4A:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: BaiduSpider X-Received-From: 107.14.73.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174071 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stephen Leake > >> > Btw, do you see the problem in "emacs -Q"? >> >> Yes, but only with the full external process code and full Ada mode >> code. > > So you are saying that sending text to the subprocess somehow depends > on the major mode? That'd be surprising. No, I just meant "not with the simplified code". So it's not a simple reproducer. In this case, it is the major mode that provides the code that uses the subprocess, so I can't meaningfully test with other major modes active. -- -- Stephe