From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:57:32 +0200 Organization: nocrew Message-ID: <85lhpirxqb.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <85ppevtsjo.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410974100 875 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2014 17:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 17 19:14:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIoe-0003EC-8m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:14:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIod-00083J-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:14:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIYB-00052g-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIY5-00084x-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:51 -0400 Original-Received: from vps34351.public.cloudvps.com ([178.18.91.250]:51428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIY5-000842-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: from c-4957e555.012-14-67626717.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.229.87.73] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by vps34351.public.cloudvps.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIXs-0002pI-HX; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:57:32 +0200 Original-Received: from lars by junk.nocrew.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XUIXs-00028r-CN; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:57:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed\, 17 Sep 2014 11\:14\:46 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 178.18.91.250 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:14:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174449 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Compiling from CL to Elisp means that the two aren't integrated, so > calling code from one to the other is not seamless. I don't know why you say that. In my implementation it's currently not entirely seamless, but close, and I can easily imagine ways to make it so. But anyway, this is not the time nor the place to discuss that. It's not really relevant to what you wrote about Emacs Lisp's future. Sorry for the noise.