From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to control isearch for invisible text Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:04 +0200 Message-ID: <85k65bsa23.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <854pwh3y55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85d5b3yenv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85d5b3tshe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155563366 12233 80.91.229.2 (14 Aug 2006 13:49:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 15:49:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCco7-0001qe-3M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCco6-0007HG-GZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCcnp-0007GA-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCcnp-0007FS-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCcno-0007FL-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:48:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GCctd-0004oS-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:54:25 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GCcnh-0004YU-9M; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C29FB1C4D3AD; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:59:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58380 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> This is pretty useless, since in your kind of application, it would >> be important to know window-point rather than point. The >> documentation of window-point already states: > > So it's called multiple times on the same buffer for each window > that displays the buffer. And you pass the window as argument (so > you rename it to pre-redisplay-functions). Big deal. Next > "problem"? > >> And that is precisely the same problem with reveal-mode: sit-for can >> be called inside of save-excursions, and the current window-point need >> not correspond with the point relevant at top-level. > > What matters is what is displayed. Which is why a > pre-redisplay-hoook is what is needed. But how would reveal-mode know what point position it should act on? For example, when outline-mode is active, and I type `)', should show-paren-mode open an overlay on `(', even if this causes recentering? After all, `pos-visible-in-window-p' is consulted by show-paren-mode before redisplay. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum