From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: lexbind
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85k5kjz9ox.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvy78zo2gs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:43:42 -0500")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> I certainly would like to have a replacement for the ugly (and
>> non-byte-compiled)
>
>> `(lambda (...) ... ',value )
>
> You can already use `lexical-let' for that. In a certain sense, the
> `lexbind' branch makes let-binding behave like lexical-let by default.
It does not look pretty in the source. Are function parameters let or
lexical-let to their values in lexbind?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 17:25 lexbind Richard Stallman
2008-03-02 19:27 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2008-03-03 18:26 ` lexbind Richard Stallman
2008-03-03 21:43 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2008-03-03 22:07 ` lexbind David Kastrup
2008-03-03 22:43 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2008-03-03 23:09 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2008-03-03 23:31 ` lexbind Miles Bader
2008-03-03 22:18 ` lexbind paul r
2008-03-03 22:45 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2008-03-04 10:12 ` lexbind paul r
2008-03-04 15:36 ` lexbind Miles Bader
2008-03-04 16:29 ` lexbind paul r
2008-03-04 23:04 ` lexbind Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-03-05 2:38 ` lexbind Miles Bader
2008-03-05 5:08 ` lexbind Dan Nicolaescu
2008-03-05 5:58 ` lexbind Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-03-14 17:03 ` lexbind paul r
2008-03-14 19:00 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2008-03-14 22:10 ` lexbind Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-03-03 22:49 ` lexbind David De La Harpe Golden
2008-03-04 23:03 ` lexbind Richard Stallman
2008-03-04 23:18 ` lexbind Miles Bader
2008-03-05 21:33 ` lexbind Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-17 22:10 lexbind Stefan Monnier
2011-02-18 3:54 ` lexbind Daniel Colascione
2011-02-18 3:57 ` lexbind Daniel Colascione
2011-02-18 4:48 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2011-02-20 18:39 ` lexbind Tom Tromey
2011-02-21 22:01 ` lexbind Stefan Monnier
2011-03-10 5:34 Emacs 23.3 released Chong Yidong
2011-03-10 16:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-10 19:21 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2011-03-11 4:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-11 7:14 ` Thierry Volpiatto
2011-03-12 3:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-12 12:23 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-03-14 14:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-14 14:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-03-14 15:51 ` Lexbind (was: Emacs 23.3 released) Stefan Monnier
2011-03-17 1:59 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-03-17 20:01 ` Lexbind Stefan Monnier
2011-03-17 22:07 ` Lexbind Wojciech Meyer
2011-03-17 23:29 ` Lexbind Juanma Barranquero
2011-03-18 7:39 ` Lexbind joakim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85k5kjz9ox.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).