From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel Subject: Re: mh-e/mh-acros.el advices `require' incorrectly Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:18:33 +0100 Message-ID: <85irsjw6ty.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <837.1137190309@olgas.newt.com> <87vewmifds.fsf@olgas.newt.com> <4375.1137374996@olgas.newt.com> <1906.1137471641@olgas.newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137495182 21783 80.91.229.2 (17 Jan 2006 10:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 17 11:52:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyoSI-00078K-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:52:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyoCj-0004Hv-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eyn1W-0005kE-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eyn1S-0005j6-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eyn1R-0005in-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eyn56-0001QF-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EymwK-0007Gt-QH; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:15:45 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B19391C4F93D; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:18:34 +0100 (CET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1906.1137471641@olgas.newt.com> (Bill Wohler's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:20:41 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49206 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:11349 Archived-At: Bill Wohler writes: > Maybe. I'm investigating it right now since it seems that every day > we uncover a new problem associated with the current mess. It's > extremely brittle. The changes will either work or they won't. If > they do, I think it would actually add to the stability of the > release to check in the changes. I'll let you know how it goes. You are aware that this sounds like smoldering duct tape all over? I am not at all acquainted with the involved code, but if you feel it is best described with those words... -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum