From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <455F9024.8080000@student.lu.se> <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163927170 15439 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 09:06:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 10:06:07 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Glick-00074H-AP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:06:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Glicj-0003rt-Rg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GlicK-0003px-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:05:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GlicI-0003oJ-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlicH-0003nY-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:05:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GlicG-0004sM-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:05:33 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GlicG-00039U-8q; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6EE341C4D3DE; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:45:06 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Sun\, 19 Nov 2006 13\:56\:00 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62456 Archived-At: Nick Roberts writes: > > > I've rolled a new pretest tarball, which is available at > > > > > > ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/emacs-22.0.91.tar.gz > > > > > > The various build problems in 22.0.90 should be resolved. We should > > > now make the pretest announcement, if Richard has finished updating > > > the pretesters list. > > > > > > We are currently working with emacsclient. It would be very good if our > > changes in emacsclient were included in the pretest. We need a little > > bit more time for resolving some issues and for testing. > > It sounds like it's too late. If the issues can't be resolved > quickly perhaps the changes should be reverted. What sense is in reverting changes if it is too late? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum