From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:52:10 +0200 Message-ID: <85hd4eivwl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146171169 2855 80.91.229.2 (27 Apr 2006 20:52:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 27 22:52:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZDTc-0004aT-Uz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:52:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZDTc-00078O-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZDTR-000782-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZDTP-00077n-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZDTP-00077k-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZDWO-0003pm-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FZDTO-0004pd-7h; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:52:26 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C4E7B1D1FFCC; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:38:53 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53512 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Do you have some local changes on your system, or is this a plain > "make bootstrap" of the CVS checkout, with all the defaults wrt > compiler switches, libraries, etc.? (Not that I see how local changes > to anything but the Lisp files themselves could produce such bloat.) > > Does anyone have ideas as to what could cause such a significant > difference in pure storage use on two identical architectures? > > I'm stumped. Different data types (UNION_something or what it was?)? Different alignment? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum