From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: <85hce1a6d0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87wsn1fl72.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prssgacl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <851w58q24a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lk3gfg40.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fxtof8x1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wsmzdpsp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87abjtr1xt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208378028 4574 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2008 20:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 16 22:34:22 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmEJk-0001FC-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:33:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEJ6-0008LG-3A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEJ0-0008Ji-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEIy-0008IR-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmEIy-0008IM-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.57]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmEIr-0003Ug-Ft; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.33]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90F92BBC2F; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:32:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.57]) by mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80EC254605; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:32:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-077-247.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.77.247]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95F92BBC2F; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:32:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 49EBC1C452D3; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:32:11 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87abjtr1xt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:15:42 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6801/Wed Apr 16 18:40:47 2008 on mail-in-17.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95366 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > Huh? We don't have the full suite, but we do have -signature variants. > > > > Bot for UTF-8, we don't, at least not in GNU Emacs 23. > > We're not talking about GNU Emacs 23, we're talking about what should > be. What I'm trying to say is that all of these variants are > occasionally useful, and they can be decomposed as text coding + > signature + EOL convention, rather than having a zillion variants with > weird names for the user to keep track of. Well, the solution is then systematic names... -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum