From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 02:29:18 -0600 Message-ID: <85h9xwhpy9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <87wq6tu5m5.fsf@kima.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416299384 30800 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 08:29:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:29:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 09:29:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqeAK-00042M-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:29:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51823 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqeAK-0006Eh-AZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqeAB-0006ES-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:29:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqeA3-0004pt-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:29:27 -0500 Original-Received: from dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.73.225]:9695 helo=dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqeA3-0004pj-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] ([70.94.38.149:53616] helo=TAKVER) by dnvrco-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 23/BF-11722-E530B645; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:29:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:30:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.130:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=aqU8CEpV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:117 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=fNEgcOh0sVsA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=mPTvJNgwBNRDXZ7KXjYA:9 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 107.14.73.225 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177527 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> I suggest you do it on a personal branch until the point where it >>> becomes testable, at which point you can move it to trunk (aka >>> "master"). >> And should personal branches be hosted in the official repository? > > No, I meant a branch that's elsewhere, possibly not hosted anywhere at > all. We will also need branches for features that are being worked on by several developers, but are not yet in master. emacs-dynamic-module, for one. So some sort of naming convention for those in the official repository would be useful. Or some designated alternate repository. -- -- Stephe