From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Keybinding nit Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: <85d58p7hyu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161185945 3718 80.91.229.2 (18 Oct 2006 15:39:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 18 17:39:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaDVU-00029N-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:39:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaDVT-0000kV-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaDVG-0000dy-NU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaDVG-0000bj-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaDVF-0000bQ-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GaDVF-0003J8-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GaDVE-0001xt-66 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2FEC41C460D2; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:37:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60886 Archived-At: C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not really intuitive. Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both buffer and window/frame? That would be quite closer to C-x k RET C-x 0 and C-x k RET C-x 5 0 in my opinion. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum