From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Carbon port and multi-tty Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 08:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: <85d4ny4ny4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87r6cf1if3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200805070428.m474SbH6002408@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200805070555.m475tCRi004681@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210142455 7078 80.91.229.12 (7 May 2008 06:40:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 06:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Dan Nicolaescu , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 07 08:41:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JtdLD-0005rM-KT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 08:41:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtdKV-00063S-Ol for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JtdK7-0005vP-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JtdK4-0005uS-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46988 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtdK4-0005uI-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtdK4-0004a9-8E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-11.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.51]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtdK3-00030J-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 02:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.29]) by mail-in-11.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382862090A1; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.50]) by mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB5827941A; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-038-131.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.38.131]) by mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83A823D1E2; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:40:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 684281C36623; Wed, 7 May 2008 08:40:05 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:59 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/7046/Wed May 7 05:35:44 2008 on mail-in-10.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96659 Archived-At: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu writes: >>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 22:55:12 -0700, Dan Nicolaescu said: > >>> The bug introduced by this change is mentioned here: >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-12/msg01069.html > >> OK, a 1 line change (in a ~1000 lines patch) that you seemed to have >> known about for a while. > > 1-line change can introduce a nasty bug as actually seen in this case. > And this could be easily avoided by not changing the part that is > unrelated to multi-tty. Please try improving your signal-to-annoyance ratio. We can't afford to have a 20+ posting fallout over every single-line bug. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum