From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.emacsen,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gnustep Subject: Re: emacs.app_9.0pre2-1_i386.changes REJECTED Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:45:50 +0100 Message-ID: <85bqzp3hkx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <5b139ad3b14fb870214cae3a61f8a5a5@gnu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134175925 12649 80.91.229.2 (10 Dec 2005 00:52:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org, pkg-gnustep-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, arobert@cogsci.ucsd.edu, storm@cua.dk, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 01:51:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkswR-0007SU-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:50:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekswl-0004Z0-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekss8-0002xm-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:45:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekss6-0002xK-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:45:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekss5-0002wS-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:45:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkstN-00052y-0G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eksqv-000819-4Q; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:44:41 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 352521C4CCE5; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:45:50 +0100 (CET) Original-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= In-Reply-To: <5b139ad3b14fb870214cae3a61f8a5a5@gnu> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCrk?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?an_Seng=FCn's?= message of "Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:50:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47360 gmane.linux.debian.devel.emacsen:1713 gmane.linux.debian.devel.gnustep:378 Archived-At: G=FCrkan Seng=FCn writes: > On 2005-12-09 20:33:11 +0100 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:12:03 +0100 >>> From: =3D?iso-8859-1?q?G=3DFCrkan_Seng=3DFCn?=3D >>> Cc: Adrian Robert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, >>> pkg-gnustep-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, >>> debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org >>>=20 >>>> Don't know whether I should put :-) or :-( here... >>> I would rather like useful comments than shit like that. >> If you continue to be rude like this, you won't hear anything at >> all. > > He started it by not having read the information i gave carefully. I don't think that rude language is a useful aid to understanding, and Kim certainly did not "start it", where "it" means anything close to using four-letter words. If you consider "not reading carefully" on the part of Kim an equal offense to your choice of words, you either have strange ideas of conduct, or you consider him quite less deserving of respect than yourself. Even if this happened to be the case, letting it show is not conducive to further cooperation, and a somewhat more diplomatic approach would seem more expedient. > What did he want to say anyways? It would appear to obvious to me after reading the information he gave carefully, that he wanted to express his opinion that releasing something from an unstable branch does not sound like the best idea. If I were to adopt your standards of discussion, I should probably use rude language for pointing out that I considered this obvious from what Kim wrote. --=20 David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum