From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Grant Shangreaux Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: ruby mode additional packages Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 08:50:02 -0500 Message-ID: <85bku110qo.fsf@churls.world> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7578"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 16:02:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9S5j-0001oc-F0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:02:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9S5i-0003AT-4z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:02:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9S3n-0001SD-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from out0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:267::]:14452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9S3l-0004wZ-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:00:51 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=churls.world; s=key1; t=1657202434; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZAW5GKpOERo2B9+7pqwoYV8xF1JJc+RY+6mDK/3GFbE=; b=YBcPPYXu3AT+HdCntvIVkYldErpqFm+WrFuorHwOd17UfrY2kYVCY/mPNsrdrZMbQpmQA6 qWo+6YZ48XCtbyli6m60jMkNBBEDWDIMTPVACjoUVN4Chjfq7r0lZwamQlA7mLY3fkzrTW TEhytzyZlc/KLcLpQE2bzSAf1Nj1KAZxhEN/3P2EYl+ckgmatSzdbu1nPmj3WTulgPCPxy 6m4R7tZ5ZThC0cs+OIvB9zD5vogYY7nKvBrbEnK8Yre0DmHoGflDEwP4fRtHBIL0Jf7rH5 mV96OYVWZTneFClmVDJHH93Mbq3HdfkkFxyugphI0x35cnRxYTJ9L6bxK44Wyg== X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: churls.world Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:267::; envelope-from=grant@churls.world; helo=out0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: 17 X-Spam_score: 1.7 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.997, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291926 Archived-At: hello emacs-devel, i've recently been re-rolling a configuration using only ELPA and non-gnu ELPA package archives. i primarily work with ruby in my day-to-day work, and was a bit surprised that many of the packages i've grown accustomed to are not available, particularly inf-ruby. i understand that much of it comes from copyright assignment issues, but i was curious if there is any work to bring some of the ruby support packages into non-gnu ELPA? i am sort of the de-facto maintainer of the minitest-emacs package, though i did not write it. i would be interested in organizing what it takes to get it into non-gnu ELPA. in addition to that, i started trying to make my own inferior ruby based off of comint-mode, and while its very basic right now, it does work. would there be any desire to add a FSF assigned new version of inferior ruby to ELPA or Emacs proper? what considerations are required for something like that? i do not want to detract from the work people put into the existing inf-ruby. i also do not want to cause any issues with copyright or licensing, for example, using inf-ruby as a basis to write a new package. i do have my FSF paperwork in order, and i'd love to contribute what i can. since i'm in ruby land most often i thought i would ask here to see where the effort would best be placed. thank you! --=20 Toks=CC=87a ake Grant Shangreaux