From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:19:10 -0600 Message-ID: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416237631 7840 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 15:20:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:20:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 16:20:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqO6I-00053p-BG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:20:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqO6H-00086U-S7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:20:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqO5O-0007Qz-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:19:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqO5F-0008J1-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:19:26 -0500 Original-Received: from dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.73.228]:9552 helo=dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqO5F-0008IC-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [70.94.38.149] ([70.94.38.149:52485] helo=TAKVER) by dnvrco-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id FA/09-11722-1F11A645; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:19:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:59:51 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.130:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=aqU8CEpV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:117 a=AppmJ/7ZOOFWL/q6u6u93g==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=fNEgcOh0sVsA:10 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=sPysZmxRE4Mn_pGRWGIA:9 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 107.14.73.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177418 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Doing it on a branch will make it less likely that I'll be disrupting >> much, but (by experience) this also means that there will be no testing >> or feedback by anybody else but me until I merge the entire thing. > > I suggest you do it on a personal branch until the point where it > becomes testable, at which point you can move it to trunk (aka > "master"). If you create the personal branch from emacs-24, you can delay the decision about merging to emacs-24 or master until later. -- -- Stephe