From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File menu changes (suggestions) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: <857jggvsl9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119881610 11510 80.91.229.2 (27 Jun 2005 14:13:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 16:13:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmuMU-0006fK-2H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:13:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmuU8-0000Xy-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:21:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmuSv-00007p-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmuSq-0008WM-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmuSq-0008W0-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmuVz-0002JS-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmuQK-00011M-2J; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:17:25 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B1DE61C12F6C; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:26:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:31:10 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39654 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39654 Miles Bader writes: > On 6/27/05, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > > I agree. Unsplit Windows at least conveys the notion that it does the >> > > opposite of Split Window. >> > >> > But it doesn't do the opposite of split-window... >> >> If you unsplit immediately after splitting, it does precisely that. > > Yeah, No. I just tried it. I had a two-window frame, used C-x 2 (got three windows) and then C-x 1. After that, I had only a single frame. So it wasn't the opposite, but rather more that happened. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum