From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: new apropos feature in Emacs-22
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:19:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8564r6w2ug.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uek5uflae.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:32:57 +0200")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 19:57:38 -0600 (CST)
>> From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
>> Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> Are you sure that most newbies are accustomed to _your brand of_
>> keyword search: at least two alternatives in any order, with no way to
>> specify other requirements, _and_ with plenty of forbidden characters,
>> that are natural in an Emacs context, like `*', `.' `+'?
>
> Whether newbies are accustomed to this remains to be proven, but the
> characters ``natural in the Emacs context'' above come from an
> experienced user.
>
>> In the keyword searches that I am familiar with you can enclose the
>> keywords in quotation marks to force sequential in order occurrence.
>
> That's an advanced feature, you know.
>
>> I believe that after your change, newbies _still_ will have to learn
>> about regexps to accomplish what they are used to in search engines.
>
> Please explain why you think so.
We have string search and replace, and regexp search and replace.
Maybe regexp-apropos could be bound on C-h C-a .
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-06 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-05 3:15 new apropos feature in Emacs-22 Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 10:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 15:52 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 16:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 17:33 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 20:38 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 22:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:00 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-05 23:18 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:28 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:37 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:31 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 23:36 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 23:39 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:21 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-06 1:57 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 4:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 5:36 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 17:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 17:22 ` David Kastrup
2005-11-06 18:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 18:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 18:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 9:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
2005-11-07 20:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 20:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 21:54 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06 20:16 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 22:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-06 18:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-06 19:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07 7:04 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07 21:55 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06 9:19 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-11-05 17:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 17:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-06 17:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 19:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:43 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06 0:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07 15:34 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 17:54 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-07 18:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-07 19:25 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-07 22:39 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-07 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 22:59 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-08 4:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-08 4:58 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-08 12:48 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-08 23:53 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-09 0:21 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-11 7:42 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-11 9:29 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-11 10:57 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-11 16:16 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-12 3:38 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-12 3:15 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-12 17:49 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-12 3:36 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-12 21:19 ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-14 4:55 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-15 0:52 ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-15 23:22 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-17 7:38 ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-17 10:06 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-09 23:25 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-10 5:44 ` Richard M. Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8564r6w2ug.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).