From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:53 +0100 Message-ID: <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172486659 12536 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 10:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 11:44:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLdL1-00033G-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:44:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdL1-0001md-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdKo-0001mU-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdKm-0001m9-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:43:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdKm-0001m6-KS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.42]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HLdKm-00012b-3Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.29]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C94A2D9093; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-13.arcor-online.net (mail-in-13.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.53]) by mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDCC279464; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-006-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.6.98]) by mail-in-13.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672AF23D1E2; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 930881D17413; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon\, 26 Feb 2007 11\:20\:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66840 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Do we have a _single_ developer who still has it on > > I do. > >> and has observed _benefits_ from its use? > > At least I didn't notice any negative impact so far. The symptom would be CPU load, and sluggish response of Emacs and the system in general, when one leaves Emacs unattended for longer amounts of time. This is particularly noticeable if the noise level of your system depends on the CPU load (like increased fan usage). Would you be likely to notice this on your system? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum