From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jemz31b4p2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon\, 26 Feb 2007 11\:20\:41 +0100")
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Do we have a _single_ developer who still has it on
>
> I do.
>
>> and has observed _benefits_ from its use?
>
> At least I didn't notice any negative impact so far.
The symptom would be CPU load, and sluggish response of Emacs and the
system in general, when one leaves Emacs unattended for longer amounts
of time.
This is particularly noticeable if the noise level of your system
depends on the CPU load (like increased fan usage).
Would you be likely to notice this on your system?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-26 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-25 12:13 Default of jit-lock-stealth-time David Kastrup
2007-02-25 13:31 ` martin rudalics
2007-02-25 22:29 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 3:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 4:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 19:52 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 20:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 7:39 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27 20:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28 7:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28 20:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-01 8:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-01 15:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 15:56 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-01 16:00 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-03-01 16:54 ` Stuart D. Herring
2007-03-01 16:57 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-03-01 17:00 ` Stuart D. Herring
2007-03-01 17:13 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-02 1:59 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-03 13:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 13:36 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-03 15:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 15:24 ` Daniel Brockman
2007-03-03 15:43 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 2:00 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-03 15:37 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-03 23:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-04 8:16 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 13:29 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 20:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-04 21:13 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-07 1:05 ` Miles Bader
2007-03-07 4:50 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-07 5:01 ` Miles Bader
2007-03-07 21:44 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-05 2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-05 7:18 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 2:00 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-04 8:42 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-05 2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 21:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27 8:17 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 20:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28 2:37 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28 2:37 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 7:16 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27 8:19 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 4:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 7:11 ` Romain Francoise
2007-02-26 7:35 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 10:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-26 10:43 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2007-02-26 10:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-27 7:38 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27 8:31 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 11:00 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28 2:37 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 11:26 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-26 11:28 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 14:56 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-26 12:13 ` Jan Djärv
2007-02-26 10:24 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 13:42 ` martin rudalics
2007-02-26 14:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 16:32 ` martin rudalics
2007-02-26 15:10 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 15:22 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 16:44 ` martin rudalics
2007-02-26 22:55 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 19:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-26 21:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 23:19 ` Miles Bader
2007-02-27 0:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27 2:10 ` Miles Bader
2007-02-27 4:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27 8:23 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 20:59 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 21:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 22:02 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28 4:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28 6:35 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28 20:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28 7:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 23:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27 4:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).