From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: undo-equiv change Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:41:24 +0200 Message-ID: <854qecnjl7.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113318456 14136 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 15:07:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 17:07:33 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLMyz-0008Mf-3b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:07:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLMZJ-0001lL-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLMXe-000106-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLMVF-0000Ga-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLMVE-0008SQ-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLMa6-00063a-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLMZq-0002nM-K1; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:41:19 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:36:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35899 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35899 Stefan Monnier writes: > Could someone explain to me what the recent change in simple.el (appended > below) does? > > I'm especially wondering why we turned a check for `equiv' into a check for > (listp equiv), thus allowing nil values through: the following code doesn't > seem to make uch sense when equiv is nil. Maybe consp was intended rather? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum