From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Emacs seg fault Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:07:10 +0200 Message-ID: <854phc5s4h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87abr4a0nv.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191150491 28075 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2007 11:08:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Leo To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 13:08:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ibwea-0007OK-1Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:08:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbweW-0007u9-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ibwdc-0007eq-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbwdZ-0007dg-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbwdY-0007dN-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IbwdX-0004XL-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ibwcl-0008Qo-Fh; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 252501C4CE10; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:07:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87abr4a0nv.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> (Kim F. Storm's message of "Sun\, 30 Sep 2007 12\:49\:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80050 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20031 Archived-At: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Leo writes: > >> #1 0x08194676 in wait_reading_process_output (time_limit=30, microsecs=0, read_kbd=-1, do_display=1, wait_for_cell=137551137, >> wait_proc=0x0, just_wait_proc=0) at process.c:4880 > > I doubt that is the right line number due to compiler optimizations. > Compile with CFLAGS="-g -O0" to get max debugging info. >From etc/DEBUG: ** When you are trying to analyze failed assertions, it will be essential to compile Emacs either completely without optimizations or at least (when using GCC) with the -fno-crossjumping option. Failure to do so may make the compiler recycle the same abort call for all assertions in a given function, rendering the stack backtrace useless for identifying the specific failed assertion. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum