From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-supports-face-attributes-p bug? Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:38:37 +0200 Message-ID: <853brqv9eq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118396948 20086 80.91.229.2 (10 Jun 2005 09:49:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, cloos@jhcloos.com, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 10 11:49:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dgg8D-0006hq-LU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:48:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DggFJ-0006Y7-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DggDJ-0005AJ-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DggDF-00059X-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DggDB-0004jU-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dgfyf-00079U-LH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dgfy7-0001zI-U7; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id CD4A21C12F6D; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:05:43 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38499 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38499 Miles Bader writes: > On 6/10/05, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > If the terminfo entry is most likely wrong, and we know it, then it >> > doesn't make sense to follow it. >> >> Nevertheless, until now, we always did. > > So.... should we not fix old bugs? Why fix an old bug if you can write three new ones in the same time? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum