From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: longlines.el fix? Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:33 +0100 Message-ID: <853bllj82i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <8564qjwd8u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87hda3uwi8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132936403 26581 80.91.229.2 (25 Nov 2005 16:33:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 17:33:20 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfgVL-0002FH-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:32:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfgVK-0005Rk-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Efeno-0000Tn-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Efene-0000A5-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:43:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EfenP-0008KL-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:43:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EfenP-0001Nh-9d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EfenN-00025j-TN; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 462191CDCD81; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:33 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87hda3uwi8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:03:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46566 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> I just noticed that a suggestion of mine for preserving markers when >> inserting has made it into longlines.el. >> >> In my private copy, I also have the following fix in. Since I rarely >> use longlines.el, it has seen only cursory testing. Does anybody see >> a particular problem with it? If not, maybe we should check it in so >> that it gets some testing. > > Looks OK to me. Please check it in. I checked in a slightly modified version of the patch that more obviously "does the same thing" after testing it somewhat. I am not sure that "the same thing" is correct however: the description of the `end-of-line' function sounds like field boundaries could cause problems. I just have no clue about the ramifications of "fields" and whether they can occur in longlines buffers. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum